<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Architectural &#8220;Sustatement&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://funktion.catalystexhibit.com/2009/12/architectural-sustatement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://funktion.catalystexhibit.com/2009/12/architectural-sustatement/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:05:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keiko Le</title>
		<link>http://funktion.catalystexhibit.com/2009/12/architectural-sustatement/comment-page-1/#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>Keiko Le</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funktion.catalystexhibit.com/?p=132#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>Intriguing post. I have been looking for some excellent resources for solar panels and found your blog. Planning to bookmark this one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intriguing post. I have been looking for some excellent resources for solar panels and found your blog. Planning to bookmark this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: build your own solar panels</title>
		<link>http://funktion.catalystexhibit.com/2009/12/architectural-sustatement/comment-page-1/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>build your own solar panels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funktion.catalystexhibit.com/?p=132#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>I wanted to have a dialogue going about this subject.  Could you actually extend on the topic you published about here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to have a dialogue going about this subject.  Could you actually extend on the topic you published about here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohammad Medero</title>
		<link>http://funktion.catalystexhibit.com/2009/12/architectural-sustatement/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohammad Medero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funktion.catalystexhibit.com/?p=132#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Can I order a supply a few months in advance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I order a supply a few months in advance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://funktion.catalystexhibit.com/2009/12/architectural-sustatement/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funktion.catalystexhibit.com/?p=132#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the savings come from not having the high replacement/maintenance costs that would normally be associated with regular construction material?  Or perhaps it was built by  true professional &quot;experts&quot; that know what they are doing (non-union), care about what they are doing (non-union) and take the time to do it right because of the impact they can have on the environment (non-union), so that the quality and longevity of the actual construction method saves money and offsets the carbon foot print over the life of the home? Maybe it&#039;s both?

In addition it was not stated in the article, but maybe the materials are recyclable, or renewable?
Would it be possible to elaborate on that?

On a last note I would also like to say that this &quot;wart of a dwelling&quot; has more character and interest than the over produced, non-descript, architecturally confused, ginourmous, inefficient,  cookie cutter homes that are currently being crapped out on a daily basis.  No wonder people don&#039;t want to buy new homes any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the savings come from not having the high replacement/maintenance costs that would normally be associated with regular construction material?  Or perhaps it was built by  true professional &#8220;experts&#8221; that know what they are doing (non-union), care about what they are doing (non-union) and take the time to do it right because of the impact they can have on the environment (non-union), so that the quality and longevity of the actual construction method saves money and offsets the carbon foot print over the life of the home? Maybe it&#8217;s both?</p>
<p>In addition it was not stated in the article, but maybe the materials are recyclable, or renewable?<br />
Would it be possible to elaborate on that?</p>
<p>On a last note I would also like to say that this &#8220;wart of a dwelling&#8221; has more character and interest than the over produced, non-descript, architecturally confused, ginourmous, inefficient,  cookie cutter homes that are currently being crapped out on a daily basis.  No wonder people don&#8217;t want to buy new homes any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
